当前位置:首页 > 教师概况 > 副教授
胡燕娟
发布时间: 2016-05-15 09:26:58   作者:本站编辑   来源: 本站原创   浏览次数:

胡燕娟,荷兰莱顿大学博士, 荷兰格罗宁根大学博士后,硕士生导师(高等教育方向)。主要从事跨文化科研教学、高校教师专业发展、大学生科研学习等领域的研究。前期采用问卷调查、访谈、叙事研究、现象学、自传民族志等一系列定量和定性研究方法,系统调查了中荷高校教师教学科研观念异同、中国学生参与国际化学习遭遇的典型困境和应对策略。

所著论文发表Higher Education, Instructional Science, Higher Education Research & Development, Innovations in Education and Teaching International, Studies in Continuing Education, Higher Education Policy,《比较教育研究》《江苏高教》《现代大学教育》等SSCI, CSSCI高水平期刊。多次赴欧美各地参加国际学术会议并做报告2012英国(SRHE)2013德国(EARLI)2014美国(AERA)2015匈牙利(ECER)2017丹麦(ECER)2018墨西哥(CIES)等。

 

研究兴趣

高校教师专业发展,跨文化教学

Research interest

University teacher professional development, transcultural teaching and learning

 

Email: huy@swu.edu.cn

Researchgatehttps://www.researchgate.net/profile/Yanjuan_Hu2/research

 

讲授课程

Educational policy, English for academic purposes, Research into intercultural teaching and learning

 

Publications

2020. Unraveling the implicit challenges in fostering independence: Supervision of Chinese doctoral students at Dutch universities. Instructional Science.                 doi:10.1007/s11251-020-09505-6. SSCI

http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11251-020-09505-6

2019. 新时代中国学生跨文化科研学习困境与超越——基于荷兰博士导师视角的质性研究[J]. 江苏高教, 2019, 10:77-83 CSSCI

2019. Transitioning to an independent researcher: Reconciling the conceptual conflicts in cross-cultural doctoral supervision. Studies in Continuing Education. doi:10.1080/0158037X.2019.1615423. SSCI

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/citedby/10.1080/0158037X.2019.1615423

2019. Integrating research into language teaching: Beliefs and perceptions of university teachers. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 56(5): 594-604, doi: 10.1080/14703297.2018.1505537. SSCI

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14703297.2018.1505537?journalCode=riie20

2017. 硕士生关键素养培养策略研究基于中荷导师访谈的比较分析[J].比较教育研究, 2017, 39(10):52-60. CSSCI

2017. 科研与教学整合:中荷大学教师的比较[J].现代大学教育, 2017(05):25-31+113. CSSCI

2016.  The purposes and processes of master's thesis supervision: a comparison of Chinese and Dutch supervisors. Higher Education Research & Development, 35(5), 910-924. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2016.1139550. SSCI

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/07294360.2016.1139550

2016. Pushing too little, praising too much? Intercultural misunderstandings between a Chinese doctoral student and a Dutch supervisor. Studying Teacher Education, 12(1), 70-87. doi: 10.1080/17425964.2015.1111204 

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17425964.2015.1111204

2015. The role of research in teaching: A comparison of teachers from research universities and those from universities of applied sciences. Higher Education Policy, 28, 535-554. doi:10.1057/hep.2014.19. SSCI

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/hep.2014.19

2014. And never the two shall meet’? Comparing Chinese and Dutch university teachers about the role of research in teaching. Higher Education, 68(4), 607-622. doi: 10.1007/s10734-014-9734-0. SSCI

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10734-014-9734-0

2014. The role of research in university teaching: A comparison of Chinese and Dutch teachers. (Doctoral dissertation), Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands. https://openaccess.leidenuniv.nl/handle/1887/26834

 

Invited presentation

June 21, 2018. Intercultural myth-understandings between Chinese international doctoral students and the supervisors in Dutch universities. Language and Culture Policy Best Practices meeting, Groningen, The Netherlands